PubTransformer

A site to transform Pubmed publications into these bibliographic reference formats: ADS, BibTeX, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.

Comparison of the Efficacies of 0.94 mm and Double Silicone Tubes for Treatment of Canalicular Obstruction.

Abstract To compare the clinical effects of the single wide-diameter bicanalicular silicone tube and the double bicanalicular silicone tube in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with canalicular trephinization for canalicular obstruction.
PMID
Related Publications

Bicanalicular silicone tubes versus otologic T-tubes in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

The outcome of silicone intubation and tube removal in external dacryocystorhinostomy patients with distal canalicular obstruction.

Predictors of Silicone Tube Intubation Success in Patients with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis.

Bicanalicular double silicone stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with lacrimal trephination in distal or common canalicular obstruction.

Bicanalicular double silicone intubation in external dacryocystorhinostomy and canaliculoplasty for distal canalicular obstruction.

Authors

Mayor MeshTerms

Silicones

Keywords

Canaliculitis

Dacryocystorhinostomy

Intubation

Lacrimal duct obstruction

Journal Title korean journal of ophthalmology : kjo
Publication Year Start




PMID- 28243017
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DA  - 20170228
DCOM- 20170314
LR  - 20170314
IS  - 2092-9382 (Electronic)
IS  - 1011-8942 (Linking)
VI  - 31
IP  - 1
DP  - 2017 Feb
TI  - Comparison of the Efficacies of 0.94 mm and Double Silicone Tubes for Treatment
      of Canalicular Obstruction.
PG  - 1-8
LID - 10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.1 [doi]
AB  - PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of the single wide-diameter
      bicanalicular silicone tube and the double bicanalicular silicone tube in
      endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with canalicular trephinization for
      canalicular obstruction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 121 
      patients with monocanalicular or common canalicular obstruction who had undergone
      endonasal DCR with random bicanalicular insertion of either double silicone tubes
      (insertion of two tubes into each canaliculus) or a single wide-diameter (0.94
      mm) silicone tube. The tubes were removed at around 3 months after surgery.
      RESULTS: This study included 79 eyes of 61 patients in the double-tube intubation
      group and 68 eyes of 60 patients in the single wide-diameter tube intubation
      group. Anatomical success, evaluated by syringing, was achieved in 72 of the 79
      eyes (91.1%) in the double-tube intubation group and 60 of the 68 eyes (88.2%) in
      the single wide-diameter tube intubation group. Functional success was achieved
      in 65 of the 79 eyes (82.3%) in the double-tube intubation group and 61 of the 68
      (89.7%) eyes in the single wide-diameter tube intubation group. There were no
      significant differences in the success rates of surgery between the two groups.
      One patient in the double-tube intubation group underwent
      conjunctivodacryocystorhinostomy (CDCR) and two in the wide-diameter tube
      intubation group underwent CDCR or reintubation to treat recurrence. CONCLUSIONS:
      Intubation using a single wide-diameter tube during endonasal DCR is as effective
      as double-tube intubation for the treatment of canalicular obstruction, with a
      lower rate of complications such as inflammation or patient discomfort.
FAU - Choi, Seong Chan
AU  - Choi SC
AD  - Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research
      Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
FAU - Choi, Hye Sun
AU  - Choi HS
AD  - Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research
      Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
FAU - Jang, Jae Woo
AU  - Jang JW
AD  - Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research
      Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
FAU - Kim, Sung Joo
AU  - Kim SJ
AD  - Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research
      Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
FAU - Lee, Jung Hye
AU  - Lee JH
AD  - Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, Myung-Gok Eye Research
      Institute, Konyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
DEP - 20170202
PL  - Korea (South)
TA  - Korean J Ophthalmol
JT  - Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO
JID - 8804513
RN  - 0 (Silicones)
SB  - IM
MH  - Adolescent
MH  - Adult
MH  - Aged
MH  - Aged, 80 and over
MH  - Dacryocystorhinostomy/*methods
MH  - Female
MH  - Follow-Up Studies
MH  - Humans
MH  - Intubation/*instrumentation
MH  - Lacrimal Duct Obstruction/*diagnosis
MH  - Male
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - Nasolacrimal Duct/diagnostic imaging/*surgery
MH  - Retrospective Studies
MH  - *Silicones
MH  - Treatment Outcome
MH  - Young Adult
PMC - PMC5327169
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Canaliculitis
OT  - Dacryocystorhinostomy
OT  - Intubation
OT  - Lacrimal duct obstruction
COI - Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article 
      was reported.
EDAT- 2017/03/01 06:00
MHDA- 2017/03/16 06:00
CRDT- 2017/03/01 06:00
PHST- 2016/08/01 [received]
PHST- 2016/10/05 [accepted]
AID - 10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.1 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Korean J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;31(1):1-8. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2017.31.1.1. Epub 2017 
      Feb 2.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<b:Sources SelectedStyle="" xmlns:b="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography"  xmlns="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/officeDocument/2006/bibliography" >
</b:Sources>