PubTransformer

A site to transform Pubmed publications into these bibliographic reference formats: ADS, BibTeX, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.

Tort Law--Expert Testimony in Asbestos Litigation--District of South Carolina Holds the Every Exposure Theory Insufficient to Demonstrate Specific Causation Even If Legal Conclusions are Scientifically Sound.--Haskins v. 3m Co., Nos. 2:15-cv-02086, 3:15-cv-02123, 2017 WL 3118017 (D.S.C. July 21, 2017).

Abstract
PMID
Related Publications

Elements of causation in toxic tort litigation. Science and law must agree.

A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.

Causation and disease: biomedical science in toxic tort litigation.

The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.

Toxic tort litigation: medical and scientific principles in causation.

Authors
Mayor MeshTerms

Causality

Keywords
Journal Title harvard law review
Publication Year Start




PMID- 29240325
OWN - HSR
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20180105
LR  - 20180105
IS  - 0017-811X (Print)
IS  - 0017-811X (Linking)
VI  - 131
IP  - 2
DP  - 2017 Dec
TI  - Tort Law--Expert Testimony in Asbestos Litigation--District of South Carolina
      Holds the Every Exposure Theory Insufficient to Demonstrate Specific Causation
      Even If Legal Conclusions are Scientifically Sound.--Haskins v. 3m Co., Nos.
      2:15-cv-02086, 3:15-cv-02123, 2017 WL 3118017 (D.S.C. July 21, 2017).
PG  - 658-65
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - United States
TA  - Harv Law Rev
JT  - Harvard law review
JID - 7703681
SB  - T
MH  - Asbestosis/*etiology
MH  - *Causality
MH  - Expert Testimony/*legislation & jurisprudence
MH  - Humans
MH  - Mesothelioma/*etiology
MH  - Science
MH  - South Carolina
EDAT- 2017/12/15 06:00
MHDA- 2018/01/06 06:00
CRDT- 2017/12/15 06:00
PHST- 2017/12/15 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2017/12/15 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/01/06 06:00 [medline]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Harv Law Rev. 2017 Dec;131(2):658-65.