PubTransformer

A site to transform Pubmed publications into these bibliographic reference formats: ADS, BibTeX, EndNote, ISI used by the Web of Knowledge, RIS, MEDLINE, Microsoft's Word 2007 XML.

Intra-operative digital imaging: assuring the alignment of components when undertaking total hip arthroplasty.

Abstract The aims of this study were to examine the rate at which the positioning of the acetabular component, leg length discrepancy and femoral offset are outside an acceptable range in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) which either do or do not involve the use of intra-operative digital imaging.
PMID
Related Publications

The Exeter technique can lead to a lower incidence of leg-length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion.

Effect of reformative acetabular centralization technology on leg-length inequality in total hip arthroplasty.

Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.

Does fluoroscopy improve acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors

Mayor MeshTerms

Hip Prosthesis

Radiographic Image Enhancement

Keywords

Arthroplasty

Hip arthroplasty

Intra-operative digital imaging

Total hip arthroplasty

Journal Title the bone & joint journal
Publication Year Start




PMID- 29292338
OWN - NLM
STAT- MEDLINE
DCOM- 20180104
LR  - 20180104
IS  - 2049-4408 (Electronic)
IS  - 2049-4394 (Linking)
VI  - 100-B
IP  - 1 Supple A
DP  - 2018 Jan
TI  - Intra-operative digital imaging: assuring the alignment of components when
      undertaking total hip arthroplasty.
PG  - 36-43
LID - 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0596.R1 [doi]
AB  - AIMS: The aims of this study were to examine the rate at which the positioning of
      the acetabular component, leg length discrepancy and femoral offset are outside
      an acceptable range in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) which either do or do not 
      involve the use of intra-operative digital imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A
      retrospective case-control study was undertaken with 50 patients before and 50
      patients after the integration of an intra-operative digital imaging system in
      THA. The demographics of the two groups were comparable for body mass index, age,
      laterality and the indication for surgery. The digital imaging group had more men
      than the group without. Surgical data and radiographic parameters, including the 
      inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component, leg length discrepancy, 
      and the difference in femoral offset compared with the contralateral hip were
      collected and compared, as well as the incidence of altering the position of a
      component based on the intra-operative image. RESULTS: Digital imaging took a
      mean of five minutes (2.3 to 14.6) to perform. Intra-operative changes with the
      use of digital imaging were made for 43 patients (86%), most commonly to adjust
      leg length and femoral offset. There was a decrease in the incidence of outliers 
      when using intra-operative imaging compared with not using it in regard to leg
      length discrepancy (20% versus 52%, p = 0.001) and femoral offset inequality (18%
      versus 44%, p = 0.004). There was also a difference in the incidence of outliers 
      in acetabular inclination (0% versus 7%, p = 0.023) and version (0% versus 4%, p 
      = 0.114) compared with historical results of a high-volume surgeon at the same
      centre. CONCLUSION: The use of intra-operative digital imaging in THA improves
      the accuracy of the positioning of the components at THA without adding a
      substantial amount of time to the operation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J
      2018;100B(1 Supple A):36-43.
CI  - (c)2018 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
FAU - Hambright, D
AU  - Hambright D
AD  - Barnes-Jewish Hospital , 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110, 
      USA.
FAU - Hellman, M
AU  - Hellman M
AD  - Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110,
      USA.
FAU - Barrack, R
AU  - Barrack R
AD  - Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110,
      USA.
LA  - eng
PT  - Journal Article
PL  - England
TA  - Bone Joint J
JT  - The bone & joint journal
JID - 101599229
SB  - AIM
SB  - IM
MH  - Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging
MH  - Adult
MH  - Aged
MH  - Aged, 80 and over
MH  - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation/*methods
MH  - Bone Anteversion/epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control
MH  - Female
MH  - Femur/diagnostic imaging
MH  - *Hip Prosthesis
MH  - Humans
MH  - Intraoperative Care/*methods
MH  - Leg Length Inequality/epidemiology/etiology/*prevention & control
MH  - Male
MH  - Middle Aged
MH  - Operative Time
MH  - Postoperative Complications/epidemiology/*prevention & control
MH  - *Radiographic Image Enhancement
MH  - Retrospective Studies
MH  - Treatment Outcome
OTO - NOTNLM
OT  - Arthroplasty
OT  - Hip arthroplasty
OT  - Intra-operative digital imaging
OT  - Total hip arthroplasty
EDAT- 2018/01/03 06:00
MHDA- 2018/01/05 06:00
CRDT- 2018/01/03 06:00
PHST- 2017/05/11 00:00 [received]
PHST- 2017/06/09 00:00 [accepted]
PHST- 2018/01/03 06:00 [entrez]
PHST- 2018/01/03 06:00 [pubmed]
PHST- 2018/01/05 06:00 [medline]
AID - 100-B/1_Supple_A/36 [pii]
AID - 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0596.R1 [doi]
PST - ppublish
SO  - Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):36-43. doi:
      10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0596.R1.